Geostrategy of Economic Spaces: Innovation and Change in Latin America Territorial Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242008000100014Keywords:
global geostrategy, power and transterritorial administration, cyberspace-time, innovation.Abstract
In this essay we analyze the geostrategy of economic spaces in the sphere of new links in the global economy, placing Latin America in the scenario of the new world order. The geostrategic dimension of economic spaces includes spatial redefinitions as a result of new global strategies of the major transnational corporations. This is, therefore, of a space-time configuration of scenarios in the articulation between the importance of the place, action site, and expression of power. Territorial administration adopts new outlines, sharing and is linked to the logistics of market interests. In the new configuration of interests of global economics, the spatial barriers are set aside and global places are created, representing fragmentations of territorialized space. Territorialization of global productive spaces represents deterritorialization of national spaces. Forms of power and influence of power radiate from them in all directions. Power and administration of territory in the large complex economic and political organisms – regional blocks – confront each member’s historic reality, the inequalities of the rates of development, culture and social levels. These realities are hard to harmonize and eventually categorize hegemonic centers of power and a national fringe of dependence. Global geostrategy, therefore, takes over, redefines and reorders productive circulation spaces, establishing new relations of power and administration of territories. Historically, Latin America continued to depend heavily on the economic order established by the colonizing countries and this dependence gradually shifted to the world financial supremacies. This dependence intensified the indebtedness process that today characterizes the so-called market of foreign debts, with significant reflections on the internal social order.Downloads
References
BAUMAN, Z. (1998) Globalization: The Human Consequences. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
BAUMAN, Z. (1999) In Search of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
BOISIER, S. (1996) Modernidad y Territorio. Santiago de Chile. Cuadernos del ILPES. 42.
BOURDIEU, P (2001) O Poder Simbólico. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.
BOUDEVILLE J. R (1961). Los Espacios Económicos. Buenos Aires: Eudebra.
CASTELLS, M. (1999) A sociedade em rede,Volume I, São Paulo: Paz e Térra.
CASTELLS, Manuel (1995). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
FOUCAULT, M. (1996) Microfísica do Poder. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.
FURTADO, C. (2000) 0 Capitalismo Global. São Paulo: Paz e Térra.
HARVEY, D. (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
LEBRUN, G. (1999) O que é poder. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
RUSSELL, B. (1938) Power: a New Social Analysis. London: George Alien & Unwin.
SANTOS, M. (1996) A Natureza do Espaco-Jécnica e lempo, Razão e Emoção. São Paulo: Hucitec.
SASSEN, S. (1999) Territorio e Territorialidade na Economia Global. In Barroso J. R. (Org.) Globalização e Identidade Nacional. São Paulo:Atlas.
TOURAINE, A. (1994) Critique de la Modernité. Librarie París: Arthéme Fayard.
VIEIRA, E. F. & Vieira, M. M. F. (2002) Geoestratégia dos Espaços Económicos: o Paradigma Espaco-Tempo na Gestão do Territorio. In Tania Fischer (Org.) Gestão do Desenvolvimento e Poderes Locáis: Marcos Teóricos e Avaliação. Salvador: Casa da Qualidade.
VIEIRA, E. F. & Vieira, M. M. F. (2003) Espaços Econômicos, Geoestratégia, Poder e Gestão doTerritório. Porto Alegre: Sagra-Luzzatto.
VIEIRA, E. F. & Vieira, M.M.F. (2004) A Dialética da Pós-modernidade: a Sociedade emTransformação. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Editora.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Journal of Technology Management & Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.