The Influence of the Actor Network on the Innovative Process of Transgenic Soybean in Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil

Authors

  • Doriana Daroit ICSA/FEEVALE
  • Luis Felipe Nascimento PPGA/EA/UFRGS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242009000400013

Keywords:

Actor Network Theory, transgenic soybean, GMO.

Abstract

Rio Grande do Sul was the first Brazilian state to plant genetically modified soybean. The sowing occurred in 1998 with Roundup Ready soybean seeds from Monsanto smuggled from Argentina. The aim of this study is to investigate how this innovative process of planting transgenic soybean came about in Rio Grande do Sul based on the actor network involved in the period 1998 to 2003. Although the innovative process has been discussed in the literature on innovation management since the work of Schumpeter, there is still no clear understanding of the issues of interests and power that involve the innovative process. Given this, from within the literature we have sought a perspective that would understand the innovative process as being political. We adopted Actor Network Theory as a base for the discussion of the primary and secondary data obtained regarding the controversy surrounding transgenic soybean in RS. The results point to the existence of two translation chains that contribute towards the formation of actor networks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Doriana Daroit, ICSA/FEEVALE

ICSA/FEEVALE

Luis Felipe Nascimento, PPGA/EA/UFRGS

PPGA/EA/UFRGS

References

BROOKES, G., Barfoot, P. (2006). Global Impact of Biotech Crops: Socio-Economic and Environmental Effects in the First Ten Years of Commercial Use. AgBio Forum, 9(3).

CALÁS, M.B., Smircich, L. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), pp. 649-71.

CALLON, M., Lascoumes, P. Barthe, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain: essai sur la democratie technique. Éditions du Seuil, Paris.

Casa Civil/Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos, (2005). Mensagem Nº 167, de 24 de março de 2005. Presidência da República, Brasília

DESCOLA, P. (2005). Par-delà nature et culture. Gallimard, Paris.

DOSI, G., Levinthal, D.A., Marengo, L. (2003). Bridging contested terrain: linking incentive based and learning perspectives on organizational evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), pp.413-36.

EMBRAPA SOJA (2003). Tecnologias de produção de soja: região central do Brasil - 2003. [Online] Available at: http://sistemasdeproducao.cnptia.embrapa.br/FontesHTML/Soja/SojaCentralBrasil2003/importancia.htm [Accessed 22 October 2007].

FREEMAN, C. (1982). The economics of technical change. Frances Pinter Publishing, London.

FREEMAN, C., Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation. 3ªed. MIT Press, Mass.

FURTADO, C. (2008). Criatividade e dependência na civilização industrial. Edição Definitiva. Companhia das Letras, São Paulo.

HEBERLÊ, A.L.O. (2005). Significações dos transgênicos na mídia do Rio Grande do Sul. PhD São Leopoldo: Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos.

JAMES, C. (1998). Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 1998. ISAAA - Brief 08.

JAMES, C. (2006). Situação global da comercialização das lavouras GM. ISAAA - Brief 35.

KLEBA, J.B. (1998). Riscos e benefícios de plantas transgênicas resistentes a herbicidas: o caso da soja RR da Monsanto. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia, 15(3), pp.9-42.

LATOUR, B. (1997). Nous n'avons jamais été modernes. La Découverte, Paris.

LATOUR, B. (2004). Politiques de la nature. La Découverte, Paris.

LATOUR, B. (2005). La science in action: introduction à la sociologie des sciences. La Découverte, Paris.

LATOUR, B. (2006). Changer de societé. Refaire de la sociologie. La Découverte, Paris.

LAW, J. (1986). On power and its tactics: a view from the sociology of science. Sociological Review, 34 , pp. 1-37.

LAW, J. (2000). Networks, ralations, cyborgs: on the social study of technology. On-Line Papers. Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

LÖWY, I. (2005). Preface. In Fleck, L. Genèse et development d'un fait cientifique. L es Belles Lettres, Paris.

LUNDVALL, B.A. et al. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31, pp.213-31.

LUNDVALL, B.A. (1999). National business systems and national systems of innovation. International Studies of Management & Organizations, 29(2).

MCCABE, D.E. et al. 1988. Stable transformation of soybean (Glycine max) by particle acceleration. Nature Biotechnology , 6, pp.923-26.

Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2007). Biossegurança. [Online] Available at: http://www.mma.gov.br [Accessed: 29 September 2007].

MIRANDA, L.C. (2005). Nova concepção de parcerias na Embrapa. [Online] Available at: http://www.abrasem.com.br [Accessed 22 August 2007].

MMA/Consultoria Jurídica, (2005). (Parecer Nº57/CONJUR/MMA/2005). Brasília.

MORTARI, R. (2006). Algumas coisas que você sempre quis saber sobre transgênicos. Revista Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação: Transgênicos passados a limpo, 2(7).

NELSON, R., Rosenberg, N. (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New York.

NODARI, R.O., Guerra, M.P. (2000). Implicações dos transgênicos na sustentabilidade ambiental e agrícola. História, Ciências, Saúde - Manguinhos , 2(2), pp. 481-91.

Nuffield Council on Bioethics, (2003). The use of genetically modified crops in developing countries: a follow-up discussion paper . [Online] Available at: http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org [Accessed 04 April 2007].

PATEL, R., Torres, R., Rosset, P. (2005). Genetic Engineering in Agriculture and Corporate Engineering in Public Debate. Genetic Engeneering, 11(4).

PELAEZ, V., Albergoni, L., Guerra, M.P. (2004). Soja transgênica versus soja convencional: uma análise comparativa de custos e benefícios. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia, 21(2), pp.279-309.

SOUSA JR. G. (2006). Brasil transgênico. Revista Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação: Transgênicos passados a limpo, 2(7).

WATANABE, E., Nutti, M.R. (2002). Alimentos geneticamente modificados: avaliação de segurança e melhorias de qualidade em desenvolvimento. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, 1(1), pp.1-14.

Downloads

Published

2009-12-03

How to Cite

Daroit, D., & Nascimento, L. F. (2009). The Influence of the Actor Network on the Innovative Process of Transgenic Soybean in Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 4(4), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242009000400013

Issue

Section

Case Studies

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.