Towards the Innovation Function

Authors

  • Paulo Antônio Zawislak Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - School of Management
  • Mauro Borges Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - School of Management
  • Douglas Wegner Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - School of Management
  • Andre Santos Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - School of Management
  • Cristina Castro-Lucas University of Brasília

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242008000200002

Keywords:

innovation, entrepreneurship, institutions, capabilities, capital

Abstract

This paper explores the main elements that influence innovation and the relationships among them. It is pointed out that innovation results from an entrepreneurial action inside an established institutional context, sustained by resources, abilities and competences and with the support of the necessary financial capital. Therefore, it is proposed that innovation is a function (just as the microeconomic production function) composed of entrepreneurship, institutions, capabilities and capital. Each one of these elements is explored individually, so that later the relationships among them can be analyzed. It is still suggested that the size of the firm is a moderator in the relationship between these elements and innovation. The study’s contribution it is the development of a conceptual model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Paulo Antônio Zawislak, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - School of Management

Graduate Program on Management Associate Professor CNPq Researcher

Mauro Borges, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - School of Management

Msc. in Business (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS) Business PhD student (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS)

Douglas Wegner, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - School of Management

Msc. in Business (Federal University of Santa Maria - UFSM) Business PhD student (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS)

Andre Santos, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - School of Management

Msc. in Business (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS) Business PhD student (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS)

Cristina Castro-Lucas, University of Brasília

Msc. in Social Management (University of Brasília – UNB) Business PhD student (University of Brasília - UNB)

References

AHMED, P.K. (1998) Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management v. I, n. 1, 30-43.

AVERMAETE, T.; VIAENE, J.; MORGAN, E.J.; CRAWFORD, N. (2003). Determinants of innovation in small food firms. European Journal of Innovation Management v.6, n. 18-17.

BOSMA, N.; HARDING, R. (2007). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor - GEM 2006 Summary Results. London Business School/Babson School. Retrieved from the Web 6/28/2007. www.gemconsortium.org

BOTELHO, A.J.J.; DIDIER, D.; RODRIGUEZ, V.R. (2006). Impulsionando o Take-off da Inovacao no Brasil: O Investidor Anjo. Proc. Enanpad. Salvador, Bahia.

BRASCOMB, LM.;AUERSWALD, RE. (2002). Between Invention and innovation: An Analysis of Funding for Early-Stage Technology Development. 2002. Retrieved from the Web 6/12/2007. http://www.atp.nist.gov/eao/gcr02-841/gcr02-841.pdf.

BRESSER PEREIRA, LC. (1992). Desenvolvimento económico e o empresario. RAE, v. 32, n.3, 6-12.

BUCKLER, S.A. (1997). The spiritual nature of innovation. Research-Technology Management, mar.-apr, 43-47.

CALLAHAN.J.; MUEGGE, S. (2003) Venture Capital's Role in Innovation: Issues, Research and Stakeholder Interests. In The international Handbook of Innovation. Elsevier, 641-663.

CHANDLER, A. D. (1992) Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, v.6, n.3, Summer, 79-100.

CORIAT, B.;WEINSTEIN, O. (2002) Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation. Research Policy, v.31, 273-290.

CUERVO-CAZURRA, A.; UN, C.A. (2007) Regional economic integration and R&D investment. Research Policy, v. 36, 227-246.

DOSI, G. (1988) Technical change and economic theory. London; New York: Pinter Publishers.

EDQUIST C; JOHNSON, B. (1997) Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations, C. Edquist (ed.). London: Pinter.

FURMAN, J.L; PORTER, M.E.; STERN, S. (2002) The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, v. 31, 899-933.

GOEDHUYS, Micheline. (2007) The impact of innovation activities on productivity and firm growth: evidence from Brazil. Working Paper Series. UNU-MERIT. Retrieved from the Web 6/15/2007. http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2007/wp2007-002.pdf

GOMPERS, P; LERNER J. (2001)The venture capital revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 15, n.2, Spring, 145-168.

LARRAIN, F. B. (2006) Innovación en Chile: Análisis e Propuestas. Serie de Estudios Económicos e Sociales. Retrieved from the Web 6/20/2007. http://www.iadb.org/publications/

LEDERMAN, D.; SAENZ, L (2007) Innovation and Development around the World, 1960-2000. 2005. Office of the Chief Economist. Latin America and the Caribbean The World Bank. Retrieved from the Web 6/22/2007. http://econ.worldbank.org

MACLEOD, G.; MCFARLANE, B.; DAVIS, C.H. (1997) The knowledge economy and the social economy. International Journal of Social Economics, v.24, n. 11, 1302-1324.

MARTINEZ-ROS, E. (2000) Explaining the decisions to carry out product and process innovations: the Spanish case. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, v. 10, n.2, 223-242.

MEGGINSON,W (2004) Toward a Global Model of Venture Capital? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 16(1): 8-26.

MONTALVO, C. (2006) What triggers change and innovation. Technovation, v.26, 312-323.

NELSON, R. R. (1991) Why Firms Differ, and How Does it Matter? Strategic Management Journal, v. 12, winter, 61 -74.

NELSON, R. R. ;WINTER, S. G. (2005) Uma teoría evolucionaría da mudanca económica. Campinas, SP: UNICAMR

NORTH, Douglas C. (1993) Instituciones, cambio institucional y desempeño económico. Mexico, Fondo de Cultura Económica.

PAVITT, K. (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13, 343-373.

PISANO, G.R (1990) The boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 153-176.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS (PWC). (2007). Institutional Website. Retrieved from the Web 6/18/2007. http://www.prw.com

RONDÉ, P.; HUSSLER, C. (2005) Innovation in regions:What does really matter? Research Policy, v.34, n.8, 1150-1172.

SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. (1942) Capitalismo, Socialismo e Democracia. Rio de Janeiro, Fundo de Cultura.

SOUITARIS,V (2002) Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation. Research Policy, v.31, 877-898.

TEECE, D.J.; PISANO, G.; SCHUEN,A. (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n.7, 509-533.

VENKATAMARAN,S. (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research.In Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth. Katz, J.A. (ed), pp. 119-138. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.

WHEELWRIGHT, S.C.; CLARK, K.B. (1992) Revolutionizing product development. New York: The Free Press.

YOO,Y; LYYTINEN, K.;YANG, H. (2005) The role of standards in innovation and diffusion of broadband mobile services: the case of South Korea. Strategic Information Systems, v. 14,323-353.

ZAWISLAK, P.A.; CASTRO-LUCAS, C.L.; SOUZA, E.C; (2007) R&D, Entrepreneurship and innovation in Brazil: where is the missing link? In Proc. IAMOT. Miami (USA).

Downloads

Published

2008-12-10

How to Cite

Zawislak, P. A., Borges, M., Wegner, D., Santos, A., & Castro-Lucas, C. (2008). Towards the Innovation Function. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 3(4), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242008000200002

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.