Organizational Factors that Affect the University-Industry Technology Transfer Processes of a Private University

Authors

  • Lisiane Closs PUCRS, IBGEN.
  • Gabriela Ferreira PUCRS
  • Alessandra Soria PUCRS
  • Claudio Sampaio PUCRS
  • Marcelo Perin PUCRS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000100007

Keywords:

technology transfer, university-industry, organizational factors, private university

Abstract

This case study researched organizational factors that affect the university-industry technology transfer (UITT) processes of a private university, chosen by its success and uniqueness in the Brazilian context. Stood out as factors: innovation among pillars of management; valuing of research and intellectual property; qualified students, teachers and managers; multidisciplinary research groups; stability of governing body; performance of the TTO, Technology Management Agency and Technology Park. Difficulties highlighted were: reconciliation of time between activities of professors-researchers, bureaucracy and centralization of administrative and legal support; valuation of research results; approach and negotiation with companies. Among suggestions are: granting greater independence to the structures in charge of UITT and making them self-sustainable; training agents in technology marketing, sale, and negotiation skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lisiane Closs, PUCRS, IBGEN.

MBA professor at IBGEN. Post-doctoral researcher at PUCRS, Business Administration Department

References

AGRAWAL, A., Kapur, D., McHale, J. (2008). How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 258-269.

AMADEI, J., Torkomian, A. (2009). As patentes nas universidades: análise dos depósitos das universidades públicas paulistas. Ciência da Informação, 38(2) 9-18.

BALDINI, N. (2006). University patenting and licensing activity: a review of the literature. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 197-207.

BALDINI, N., Grimaldi, R., Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or no to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333-354.

BERCOVITZ, J., Feldman, M. (2008) Academic entrepre- neurs: organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69-69.

BERNEMAN, L., Denis, K. (1998). Evolution of academic- industry technology transfer in the USA. Industry and Higher Education, August, 202-205.

CALDERA, A., Debande, O. (2010). Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39, 1160-1173.

CASTRO, A., Jannuzzi, C., Mattos, F. (2007). Produção e disseminação de informação tecnológica: a atuação da Inova – agência de inovação da UNICAMP. Transinformação, 19(3), 265-277.

CLOSS, L., Ferreira, G. , Sampaio, C., Perin, M. (2012). Intervenientes na transferência de tecnologia universidade- empresa: o caso PUCRS. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 16(1), 59-78.

CORRÊA, F. (2007). A patente na universidade: contexto e perspectivas de uma política de geração de patentes na Universidade Federal Fluminense. Master’s Dissertation. Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói.

COSTA, L., Torkomian, A. (2008). Um estudo exploratório sobre um novo tipo de empreendimento: os spin-offs acadêmicos. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 12(2), 395-427.

DALMARCO,G., Dewes, M., Zawislak, P., Padula, A. (2011). Universities’ intellectual property: path for innovation or patent competition? Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(3), 159-169.

ELFENBEIN, D. (2007). Publications, patents, and the market for university inventions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 63, 688-715.

ETZKOWITZ, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.

FUJINO, A., Stal, E. (2007). Gestão da propriedade intelectual na universidade pública brasileira: diretrizes para licenciamento e comercialização. Revista de Negócios, 12(1), 104-120.

GODOY, A. (2005). Refletindo sobre critérios de qualidade da pesquisa qualitativa. Gestão.Org., 3(1), 85-94.

GOLISH, B. L., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Shuman, L. (2008). Comparing Academic and Corporate Technology Development Processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 47– 62.

GUARNICA, L., Torkomian, A. L. (2009). Gestão de Tecnologia em universidades: uma análise do patenteamento e dos fatores de dificuldades e de apoio à transferência de tecnologia no Estado de São Paulo. Gestão & Produção, 16 (4), 624-638.

LAHORGUE, M. (2004). Pólos, parques e incubadoras: instrumentos de desenvolvimento do século XXI. Evan- graf, Brasília.

LANDRY, R., Saihi, M., Amara, N., Ouimet, M. (2010). Evi- dence on how academics manage their portfolio of knowled- ge transfer activities. Research Policy, 39, 1387-1403.

LEYDESDORFF, L., Meyer, M. (2003). The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations: A model for innovation in the ‘knowledge based’ economy. Scientome- trics, 58(2), 445-467.

MUSCIO, A. (2010). What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidences from Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 181-202.

OECD – Organization for the Economic Cooperation and Development. (2003). Turning Science into Business – Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organizations. Paris, France. 308p.

PARK, S., Lee, Y. (2011). Perspectives on technology transfer of Korean companies in point of resource and capability based view. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(1), 161-184.

PÓVOA, L. (2008). Patentes de universidades e institutos públicos de pesquisa e a transferência de tecnologia para empresas no Brasil. Doctoral Thesis. Universidade Fede- ral de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.

QUERIDO, A., Lage, C., Vasconcellos, A. (2011). What is the destiny of patents of Brazilian universities? Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(1), 46-57.

RAHAL, A. (2008). University technology buyers a glimpse into their thoughts? Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 3(1), 38-41.

RAPINI, M., Righi, H. (2006). O diretório de grupos de pes- quisa do CNPq e a interação universidade-empresa no Brasil em 2004. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 5(1), 131-156.

SANTANA, E., Porto, G. (2009). E agora, o que fazer com essa tecnologia? Um estudo multicaso sobre as possibilidades de transferência de tecnologia na USP-RP. Re- vista de Administração Contemporânea, 13(3), 410-429.

SANTOS, M., Solleiro, J. (2006). Relações universidade- empresa no Brasil: diagnóstico e perspectivas. In: Audy, J. and Morosini, M. (Orgs.). Inovação e Empreendedorismo na Universidade. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre. pp. 346-376.

SEGATTO-MENDES, A.P., Mendes, N. (2006). Cooperação tecnológica universidade-empresa para eficiência energética: um estudo de caso. Revista de Administração Contemporânea [Edição Especial], 53-75.

SIEGEL, D., Waldman, D., Atwater, L., Link, A. (2004). Toward a model of effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115-142.

SILVA, E. (2007). A experiência de colaboração do departamento de engenharia metalúrgica e de materiais da UFMG com empresas – lições para a Lei de Inovação. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 6(2), 433-459.

TERRA, B. (2001) A transferência de tecnologia em uni- versidades empreendedoras: um caminho para a inovação. Qualitymark, Rio de Janeiro.

THURSBY, J., Fuller, A., Thursby, M. (2009). US faculty patenting: inside and outside the university. Research Po- licy, 38, 14-25.

THURSBY, J., Thursby, M. (2011). Faculty participation in licensing: implications for research. Research Policy, 40(1), 20-29.

YIN, R. (2003). Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e Métodos. Bookman, 3 ed., Porto Alegre.

YOUNG, T. (2006). Academic technology transfer. In: Audy, J., Morosini, M. (Orgs.). Inovação e empreendedorismo na universidade. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre. pp. 320-360.

ZAWISLAK, P., Dalmarco, G. (2011). The silent run: new issues and outcomes for university-industry relations in Brazil. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation,

(2), 66-81.

Downloads

Published

2012-02-29

How to Cite

Closs, L., Ferreira, G., Soria, A., Sampaio, C., & Perin, M. (2012). Organizational Factors that Affect the University-Industry Technology Transfer Processes of a Private University. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000100007

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.