R&D and Innovation Management in the Brazilian Electricity Sector: the Regulatory Constraint

Authors

  • Denile Cominato Boer Department of Science and Technology Policy, University of Campinas
  • Sergio Luiz Monteiro Salles-Filho Department of Science and Technology Policy, University of Campinas
  • Adriana Bin School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242014000100004

Keywords:

research and development (R&D), innovation policy, R&D management, electricity sector

Abstract

In 2000 it became mandatory to the Brazilian electricity companies to invest in research, development and innovation (RDI). These investments are performed by firms and regulated by the Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency (ANEEL). Since then companies have sought ways to cope with this obligation creating internal structures and managerial processes. This article presents the evolution of RDI management routines and organizational models based on a multiple-case study conducted between 2011 and 2012 with seven companies that represent about 27% of the total RDI investment performed in the period of 2008 to 2013. The research showed that firms created minimalist management and organizational structures to handle with the RDI enforcement. Companies have been much more concerned with the regulatory risk (the risk of non-accomplishment with the obligations) than to any strategic use of RDI effort since the legal framework is based on punishment rather than in stimulus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Denile Cominato Boer, Department of Science and Technology Policy, University of Campinas

Background in Electrical Engineering; Master in Electrical Engineering and PhD in Science and Technological Policy. Areas of interest: planning and management of science, technology and innovation.

Sergio Luiz Monteiro Salles-Filho, Department of Science and Technology Policy, University of Campinas

Background in Agronomic Engineering; Master in Energy Applied to Agriculture and PhD in Economics. Academic visitor in Manchester Institute of Innovation Research between 2013 and 2014. Formerly Head of Planning of the National Agency for Innovation, FINEP and Director of the School of Applied Sciences at Unicamp. Founded, in 1995, the Study Group on the Organization of Research and Innovation - GEOPI. Areas of interest: economics, planning and management of science, technology and innovation.

Adriana Bin, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas

Background in Food Engineering; Master and PhD in Science and Technological Policy. Academic visitor in Manchester Institute of Innovation Research between 2013 and 2014. Researcher of the Study Group on the Organization of Research and Innovation – GEOPI. Areas of interest: planning and management of science, technology and innovation, strategic planning, research evaluation.

References

ABRADEE - ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE DISTRIBUIDORAS DE ENERGIA ELÉTRICA. (2009). ABRADEE Survey: Benchmarking da Gestão do P&D nas Concessionárias de Distribuição de Energia Elétrica: Organização e Infra-Estrutura. ABRADEE, Brasília-DF.

ADAMS, R., Bessant, J., Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21-47.

ANEEL – Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica (2008). Manual do programa de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento tecnológico do setor de energia elétrica 2008. Brasília, DF. http://www.aneel.gov.br/. [Accessed December 02, 2011].

ANEEL – Agência Nacional de energia Elétrica (2010). http://www.aneel.gov.br/. [Accessed May 26, 2010].

BAER, W., McDonald, C. (1998). A return to the past? Brazil's privatization of public utilities: The case of the electric power sector. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 38(3), 503-523.

CAMPOS, I. A. (2007). Potencialidades e Energias Renováveis no Brasil: Perspectiva Eólica. 1o Seminário do Centro-Oeste de Energias Renováveis. Goiânia.

CUNHA J. C., Silva E., Dias C., Girardi S. (2008). Sistema Setorial de Inovação de Energia Elétrica no Brasil: Estrutura e Trajetórias. XXV Simpósio de Gestão da Inovação Tecnológica. Brasília-DF.

DEFEUILLEY, C., Furtado, A. T. (2000). Impacts de l’ouverture à la concurrence sur la R&D dans le secteur électrique. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71(1), 5–28.

DODGSON, M., Gann, D., Salter, A. (2008). The Management of Technological Innovation: Strategy and Practice. Oxford University Press, New York.

FERRO, A. F. P. (2009). Modelos de seleção e priorização de atividades de P&D. Working Paper. Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.

FURTADO, A. (2011). O sistema setorial de inovação do setor elétrico brasileiro e o CTEnerg. IPEA, Campinas.

GEE, S., Miles, I. (2013). Cultures and Innovation. In: Cox, D., Rigby, J. (Eds.). Innovation Policy Challenges of the 21stdu Century. Routledge, New York. pp. 244-267.

HELM, D., Jenkinson T. (1998). Competition in Regulated Industries. Oxford University Press, New York.

HERRIOTT, R. E., Firestone, W. A. (1983). Multiuse qualitative policy research: optimizing description and generalizability. Educational Researcher, 12 (2), 14-19.

HIDALGO A., Albors J. (2008). Innovation management techniques and tools: a review from theory and practice. R&D Management, 38(2), 113-127.

IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2008). Pesquisa de Inovação Tecnológica – PINTEC 2008. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.

JAMASB, T. (2006). Between the state and market: Electricity sector reform in developing countries. Utilities Policy, 14(1), 14-30.

JAMASB, T., Pollitt, M. (2008). Liberalisation and R&D in network industries: The case of the electricity industry. Research Policy, 37(6-7), 995–1008.

JAMASB, T., Pollitt, M. (2011). Electricity sector liberalisation and innovation: An analysis of the UK's patenting activities. Research Policy, 40(2), 309-324.

JANNUZZI, G. M. (2000). Energy efficiency and restructuring of the Brazilian power sector. Energy for Sustainable Development, 4(2), 17-22.

JANNUZZI, G. M. (2005). Power sector reforms in Brazil and its impacts on energy efficiency and research and development activities. Energy Policy, 33(13), 1753-1762.

MARGOLIS, R. M., Kammen D. M. (1999). Underinvestment: The Energy Technology and R&D Policy Challenge. Science, 285 (5428), 690-692.

OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd ed. OECD Publishing, Paris.

PAVITT, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, 13 (6), 343 – 373.

PHAAL, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., Probert, D. R. (2006) Technology management tools: concept, development and application. Technovation, 26(3), 336–344.

POMPERMAYER, F. M., De Negri, F., Paulo, J. M. P., Cavalcante, L. R. (2011). Rede de pesquisa formada pelo programa de P&D regulado pela ANEEL: abrangência e características. In: Pompermayer, F. M., De Negri, F., Cavalcante, L. R. (Org). Inovação tecnológica no setor elétrico brasileiro: uma avaliação do programa de P&D regulado pela ANEEL. Ed. IPEA, Brasília-DF.

SCHIMITT, S., Kucsera, D. (2013). The Impact of the Regulatory Reform Process on R&D Investment of European Electricity Utilities. Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2013: Wettbewerbspolitik und Regulierung in einer globalen Wirtschaftsordnung - Session: Regulated Industries, No. A14-V3.

SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: a theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. Mcgraw-Hill, New York.

SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. George Allen & Unwin, London.

SILVA Jr., R. G., Procopiuck, M., Quandt, C. O. (2009). A Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento na Estratégia Competitiva das Concessionárias do Setor Elétrico Brasileiro. XII Simpósio de Administração da Produção, Logística e Operações Internacionais, São Paulo.

SOARES, V. R. (1997). Mudanças Institucional e Organizacional no Setor Elétrico Brasileiro Frente às Novas Tendências da Dinâmica Tecnológica. PhD Thesis. Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas.

TENÓRIO, J. B. Jr. (2009). Indicadores e métricas: ferramentas para avaliação de resultados de P&D visando a inovação no setor elétrico. Master Degree Dissertation. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.

TIDD, J., Bessant, J., Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. 1st Ed., John Wiley, New York.

YIN, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: design and methods. 4rd Ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Downloads

Published

2014-04-24

How to Cite

Boer, D. C., Salles-Filho, S. L. M., & Bin, A. (2014). R&D and Innovation Management in the Brazilian Electricity Sector: the Regulatory Constraint. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242014000100004

Issue

Section

Research Articles